Analysis: Boris Johnson’s bluster fails him in the liaison committee bear pit
Much like a 30-mile drive to test the eyesight, Boris Johnson’s appearance before the liaison committee was always liable to end in a car crash.
by Daniel O'DonoghueSign up for our daily Politics briefing for political exclusives, analysis and debate.
Thank you for signing up to our Politics newsletter.
Something went wrong - please try again later.
Sign Up
After a six-day hammering in the press over his decision not to sack lockdown-flouting adviser Dominic Cummings, Johnson had hoped today’s appearance would bring the issue to a close.
Oh, how those hopes were misplaced.
Boris’s bluster truly failed him in the liaison committee bear pit.
With every mumble, half answer and attempt at humour, Johnson succeeded only in fuelling the angry fire raging over the government’s performance in recent days.
First contact came when the SNP’s Pete Wishart shot that Johnson had for once “united the nation in condemnation” with his actions over Cummings.
The prime minister offered a meek defence, saying a lot of the stories about that matter were false – but would not expand on what stories.
Then came a full-frontal assault from Labour’s Yvette Cooper, who accused Johnson of putting a political adviser over the nation’s health.
Grenades from the opposition are always expected, but friendly fire is never welcome.
Former Tory business minister Greg Clark tied Johnson up in knots over his involvement in the Covid-19 response, eventually eliciting an awkward admission: “I don’t actually read the scientific papers except in exceptional circumstances.”
Then came a toe-curling exchange with former Home Office minister Caroline Nokes, who was sacked by Johnson last year.
Johnson was asked by Nokes to explain the involvement of women in his government’s decision making.
Johnson responded “oh boy” before laughing. “That’s a question on which I’m not competent to pronounce.”
He then told how the Tories have had two female prime ministers before telling Nokes “maybe you’ll be the third” – breaking the cringe-o-meter in the process.
The worst, and perhaps most damaging exchange, came in response to a question from Labour’s Stephen Timms.
The prime minister struggled to explain why a working immigrant family with British-born children and temporary leave to remain in the UK had no recourse to public funds – a long-standing policy for some non-EU migrants that denies them benefits.
“Why aren’t they eligible for universal credit or ESA?” Johnson said.
“Because they have no recourse to public funds, that’s a condition that’s attached to their leave to remain,” Timms shot back.
“Ah”, the prime minister said. Ah indeed.
Support The Courier today.
The Courier is committed to delivering quality content to our communities and right now that’s more important than ever, which is why our key content is free. However you can support us and access premium content by subscribing to The Courier from just £5.99 a month. Because Local Matters.
Subscribe
Tags
More from The Courier UK politics team
A glimpse of a greener world — but will it outlast the lockdown?
May 28 2020
Premium Content
A new age of austerity? The search for a solution to the crippling burden of Covid-19
May 28 2020
Premium Content
Period poverty getting worse under lockdown, charity says
May 28 2020
More from The Courier
Coronavirus: Pandemic political infighting intensifies amid Angus Council ‘ruling mafia’ claims
Angus music school held virtual concert and weekly quizzes to keep community entertained
Plea for more CCTV to catch fly tippers blighting Fife’s communities
Coronavirus: Singer to mark Clap for Carers with socially distant ‘street concert’ in Cowdenbeath
CORONAVIRUS LIVE: Your key updates on May 28
All the fun of the fair society: The post-Covid dream of swapping business as usual for better than usual
Premium Content