Australian businesses in China urge focus on 'common ground'

by

Shanghai | Australian businesses in China, alarmed at rising hostilities between Beijing and Canberra, have urged the Morrison government not to abandon plans for a $44 million foundation to foster bilateral relations and urged both countries to find common ground.

With exporters of vitamins, dairy, wine and beef products jittery about a potential backlash from Beijing, business groups said it was crucial the importance of the trading relationship was not lost in the political noise.

https://static.ffx.io/images/$zoom_0.276%2C$multiply_0.7214%2C$ratio_1.776846%2C$width_1059%2C$x_0%2C$y_0/t_crop_custom/e_sharpen:25%2Cq_42%2Cf_auto/96d5f91abe96cf93e95774a26509dfc73e28ed24
Australian barley has been hit with crippling tariffs amid a deteriorating relationship with China. iStock

While openly confident about record trade between the two countries, executives on the ground in China privately fear punitive tariffs slapped on Australian barley and technical bans on some beef shipments in the past fortnight could be just the beginning.

The Australian Chamber of Commerce Shanghai said on Wednesday that a strong trading relationship with China was in Australia's national interest.

"The strength of our economy is going to be intertwined with China and and we can't forget strong business ties are in the national interest," Jack Brady, the chamber's chief executive, told The Australian Financial Review.

He said thousands of livelihoods and jobs relied on good trading conditions with China, noting that small businesses as well as large corporations depended on Australia's biggest commercial partner.

More than half the 100 companies surveyed by the chamber in February expected a sharp drop in first-quarter revenues from the fallout of COVID-19. Its largest members include BHP, Rio Tinto, BlueScope Steel, Treasury Wine Estates and the major banks. But it also has a large number of small and medium-sized enterprises doing business in China.

Mr Brady said the federal government should move ahead with plans to form the National Foundation for Australia-China Relations. The future of the body, which was announced with much fanfare in May last year, has been under a cloud while relations deteriorated.

The body's chairman and former Howard government minister Warwick Smith has resigned. The Australia-China Council was rebranded and was supposed to have its funding increased from $900,000 annually to $44 million over five years.

"This would be a good start. Surely there has never been a better time to fire up a body with the express intention of deepening cooperation with China," Mr Brady said.

"We know that the relationship goes through challenges from time to time, but the expectation from Australian business in China is that our diplomats will do what they always do and work to find common ground."

Big business, however, stopped short of calling for Mr Morrison to back down on his push for an international probe into the origins and spread of the coronavirus.

Rising anti-China rhetoric over the origins of the pandemic and calls for an economic decoupling from the world's second-biggest economy have alarmed Australians doing business with the trading giant. But there is also an acknowledgment that the political risk of dealing with China has increased dramatically, even though it remains a promising export market.

China's actions against beef and barley imports from Australia have come since the Morrison government's international inquiry call, and amid indirect threats from Beijing that the move could hurt exports.

It is feared China will use onerous customs and inspections procedures to either slow or ban other Australian products.

Nick Coyle, chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce in Beijing, said Australian companies nonetheless remained optimistic about China.

"Bilateral relations can ebb and flow, and we urge both governments to focus on the areas of strong collaboration and areas of common interest," he said in an interview with China's Global Times newspaper, which has ramped up its criticism of Australia.

"Where there are differences - and in any meaningful bilateral relationship there are always some differences of perspective - these should be addressed in a constructive way."