Man spends last 30 years in psychiatric hospital - and no one knows who he is, High Court hears

The elderly man has referred to living in Dublin 'for years' but his true identity is not known

An elderly man has remained in a psychiatric hospital here for more than 30 years - and no-one knows who he is, a court heard.

The patient was first admitted to the institution after being taken there by gardai in the mid-1980s.

He was reported to be living “a hermit’s life” and sleeping in a bus shelter with a dog whom he said he had “on loan”.

He had also referred to living in Dublin “for years”.

At some point after his admission, he was given a name and estimated date of birth of 1930 but essentially remains a ‘John Doe’.

Efforts to establish his true identity and to find any next of kin have failed but they have been reactivated in recent years arising from advances in technology. The man has a history of schizophrenia and dementia, along with cardiac and respiratory conditions, and his condition is deteriorating.

In those circumstances, his case came before High Court president Mr Justice Peter Kelly yesterday.

Lebeau Jonker, solicitor of the HSE, secured an order, ex parte (one side only represented) and in the context of intended wardship proceedings, to have a court-appointed doctor visit the man for the purpose of assessing his capacity.

The judge also made an order appointed a guardian ad litem to represent the man’s interests in the wardship matter.

Sign-up for the Irish Mirror newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Simply pop your e-mail into the box at the top of this article and get all the latest news and entertainment direct to you

Every day we'll send you a roundup e-mail of all the latest news. Local Irish news, UK and international news, local and national Sport and entertainment news , all in one handy e-mail.

You can unsubscribe from this service at any time. And rest assured that your data will not be shared with any other party.

The court heard the application arose in a situation where doctors said the man’s physical health is deteriorating and he has had a number of hospital admissions, including for fluid retention from heart failure and recurrent respiratory tract infections.

His clinical team consider it would not be appropriate to resuscitate him should his condition deteriorate further. Rather than a further hospital admission, they believe he should be made comfortable where he is.

The man had also expressed a desire he should not be sent to a general hospital should he get worse but doctors are concerned whether he has capacity to make decisions about his health and welfare.

They are also concerned that any decision against resuscitation should have a legal basis.

The matter will return to court in some weeks after the medical visitor has assessed the man and provided a report to the court.