Pressure mounts on Calgary to pass bylaw banning conversion therapy

by

Maeve Casey remembers sitting in a chair and someone placing a cap on her head and guard in her mouth. There was a huge machine in the room. The place smelled like a dingy doctor’s office. Someone told her what was about to happen wouldn’t hurt much.

“I remember wires sticking out of my head,” Ms. Casey said in an interview. “The pain was like a bunch of needles in your brain. Stabbing your brain."

Ms. Casey was about 7 then, and had earlier told her parents that she was a girl rather than a boy, the gender to which she was assigned at birth. Ms. Casey, now 46, spent decades in the metaphorical closet, trying to piece together what happened that day. About a month ago, Ms. Casey shared blurry bits with her fiancée. Her future wife pulled up a picture of a cap like the one Ms. Casey described. It was a match.

“She’s like: ‘This is a cap for electric-shock therapy.' "

Now, Ms. Casey is among the hundreds of people lobbying Calgary city councillors to ban conversion therapy, an umbrella phrase for practices that try to change or repress someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Methods range from outdated techniques such as electric shocks to more modern approaches such as talk therapy, extreme fasting, exorcism and aversion therapy. On Monday, Calgary city councillors will vote on a bylaw that would prohibit conversion-therapy operations from obtaining business licences, making Calgary’s effort more than a symbolic nod to inclusivity. The proposed bylaw, which would apply to organizations trying to make money as well as not-for-profit organizations, comes with teeth: Those violating the ban face fines up to $10,000 or up to a year in jail.

Groups ranging from the World Health Organization to the College of Alberta Psychologists condemn conversion therapy, also known as reparative therapy, as harmful, fraudulent, unethical and unscientific. Vancouver, in 2018, became the first Canadian city to ban conversion therapy; Strathcona County in 2019 became the first municipality in Alberta to pass rules restricting conversion therapy. A number of municipalities have since followed suit, including Edmonton and Fort McMurray. Lethbridge councillors expect a draft bylaw on their desks in June. Not all attempts to limit the practice in Alberta have been successful. In February, Red Deer rejected a motion to take action against conversion therapy, according to documents provided to Calgary councillors. A handful of provinces have passed restrictions limited to health care settings, and the federal government has proposed five offences related to conversion therapy be added to the criminal code.

Conversion therapy, Calgary officials say, has existed in Canada since the 1950s and gained traction in the eighties and nineties. While electroshock therapy, such as the kind Ms. Casey endured, is no longer practised in Canada, modern methods such as gender coaching and regression role play can still have painful consequences, said Kristopher Wells, a professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, who holds the Canada Research Chair for the public understanding of sexual and gender minority youth.

“It’s not therapy," Dr. Wells said. “It is torture.”

Roughly 20 per cent of Canadian men who identify as gay, bisexual, transgender, two-spirited or queer have experienced efforts to change their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, according to Vancouver’s Community-Based Research Centre’s interim survey results released in February. Of those, roughly 40 per cent – the equivalent of 47,000 men – experienced conversion therapy, according to CBRC’s study, which Calgary officials used when shaping the proposed bylaw.

Religious leaders frequently oppose efforts to outlaw conversion therapy, arguing bans infringe on freedoms. In Calgary, however, 44 faith leaders, in a letter late last week, told council any assertion that the proposed bylaw attacks religious freedom is “hyperbolic and false.” The proposed ban excludes the “practice, treatment, or service that relates” to a person’s “social, medical, or legal gender transition,” as well as to an individual’s “non-judgmental exploration and acceptance of their identity or development.”

Carolyn Herold, an assistant priest at Calgary’s St. Laurence Anglican Church, said the bylaw is worded to protect, rather than infringe upon, individual rights. “There’s a specific provision that you can still talk about your faith,” Rev. Herold said in an interview. “No one’s religious rights are being denied.”

Mark Glickman, a rabbi from Calgary’s Temple B’nai Tikvah, said his faith guided his decision to support the ban and that it is a “shame” some use Jewish scripture to justify oppression of LGBTQ people.

“God doesn’t make too many mistakes,” he said. “Conversion therapy, in its attempt to change people into individuals they are not, has brought immeasurable harm to a lot of people.”

Calgary city councillor Jyoti Gondek, when asked why Calgary is weighing in on a social issue rather than focusing on city operations such as sewers, argued municipalities have an obligation to legislate against businesses with harmful practices. Calgary does not permit prostitution businesses, Ms. Gondek said as an example.

“We are the order of government that is closest to our people,” she said.

Calgary mayor Naheed Nenshi said the public hearings over the bylaw reminded him that not all human-rights battles have been won. Many LGBTQ people, he said, are still marginalized. “This is critical that in a battle many think has already been won, we continue to stand up for the rights of gender- and sexually diverse people.”

And that is why Ms. Casey, who lives in Edmonton, shared her story as part of Calgary’s public-hearing process. “I never want this to happen to anyone ever, ever, ever, again. It was tragic, what happened to me. Having my voice being taken away."

Here’s a look at conversation-therapy bans in Alberta and provincial legislation across the country:

Sources: Calgary City Hall; municipal bylaws; provincial legislation