Man City banned from European competition for two seasons by UEFA


MANCHESTER, England (Reuters) - English champions Manchester City have been banned from European competition for the next two seasons and fined 30 million euros ($32.53 million) by European soccer’s governing body UEFA after an investigation into alleged breaches of Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules.

Manchester City banned from European competition for the next two seasons by UEFA
English Premier League soccer champion manchester City will appeal against its two-year ban from European Competition, for breaches in financial fair play rules and take its case to the court of arbitration for sport. Adam Reed reports.

UEFA announced in a statement here that City had committed "serious breaches" of the rules while the Premier League club swiftly said on their website here that they will appeal the decision to the Lausanne-based Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

The ruling, if upheld, would mean Pep Guardiola’s side would not be able to compete in the 2020-21 Champions League should they again qualify for Europe’s top club competition. They would also be banned from European competition in the 2021-22 season.

The top four teams in the Premier League qualify for the Champions League and City are currently second — should the ban stand then the fifth-placed team would take their spot.

An absence from Europe would have a significant impact on the club’s revenue and their prestige. Liverpool earned 111 million euros from UEFA for winning last season’s competition.

The Premier League said in March that it had opened its own investigation into City and FFP after UEFA began its probe.

UEFA’s FFP rules are designed to prevent clubs receiving unlimited amounts of money through inflated sponsorship deals with organizations related to the owners.

The Adjudicatory Chamber of UEFA’s Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) said City had broken the rules by “overstating its sponsorship revenue in its accounts and in the break-even information submitted to UEFA between 2012 and 2016” and added that the club “failed to cooperate in the investigation”.

But City, who have denied any wrongdoing, said in a strongly worded response that they will fight the decision.

“Simply put, this is a case initiated by UEFA, prosecuted by UEFA and judged by UEFA. With this prejudicial process now over, the Club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity,” the club said.
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Premier League - Manchester City v Burnley - Etihad Stadium, Manchester, Britain - October 20, 2018. Manchester City badge REUTERS/Darren Staples/File Photo


Describing themselves as “disappointed but not surprised” by the decision, City took aim at the investigation process.

“In December 2018, the UEFA Chief Investigator publicly previewed the outcome and sanction he intended to be delivered to Manchester City, before any investigation had even begun.

“The subsequent flawed and consistently leaked UEFA process he oversaw has meant that there was little doubt in the result that he would deliver. The Club has formally complained to the UEFA Disciplinary body, a complaint which was validated by a CAS ruling.”

City face Real Madrid later this month in the last 16 of this season’s Champions League as Guardiola tries to secure a trophy that the club have never won.

Spanish La Liga head Javier Tebas welcomed the punishment.

“UEFA are finally taking decisive measures. Enforcing financial fair play rules and punishing financial doping is essential for the future of football. We’ve been asking for severe action against Manchester City and Paris Saint Germain for years. Better late than never,” tweeted Tebas.

In March 2019, PSG won a legal battle against UEFA after the governing body tried to reopen its investigation into the French club’s spending on transfer fees and wages.

UEFA opened an investigation into Manchester City that month after the publication of ‘Football Leaks’ documents led to allegations that the club’s Abu Dhabi owners had inflated sponsorship agreements to comply with FFP requirements.

Reuters reported extensively on City and FFP issues arising from the Football Leaks documents in The Soccer Files here series.
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Champions League - Manchester City vs Shakhtar Donetsk - Etihad Stadium, Manchester, Britain - September 26, 2017 Manchester City's Leroy Sane reacts REUTERS/Phil Noble/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Champions League - Manchester City Press Conference - Etihad Campus, Manchester, Britain - April 16, 2019 Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola during the press conference Action Images via Reuters/Jason Cairnduff/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Premier League - Manchester City v Manchester United - Etihad Stadium, Manchester, Britain - December 7, 2019 Manchester City Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak and Chief Executive Ferran Soriano in the stands Action Images via Reuters/Jason Cairnduff/File Photo
Football - Manchester City v Liverpool - Barclays Premier League - The City of Manchester Stadium - 10/11 - 23/8/10 - Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan waves Mandatory Credit: Action Images / Jason Cairnduff
Slideshow (4 Images)

The Abu Dhabi United Group, the investment vehicle owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is the majority owner of the City Football Group, with a stake of around 77%.

The City Football Group includes the Manchester club and owns or part-owns New York City FC, Melbourne City FC, Yokohama F. Marinos in Japan, Club Atletico Torque in Uruguay, Girona FC in Spain and Sichuan Jiuniu FC in China.

($1 = 0.9222 euros)