Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) CEO Marty Birmingham on Q4 2019 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
by SA Transcripts, https://seekingalpha.com/author/sa-transcriptsFinancial Institutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:FISI) Q4 2019 Results Conference Call January 31, 2020 8:30 AM ET
Company Participants
Shelly Doran - Director, Investor and External Relations, EVP and General Counsel
Marty Birmingham - President and CEO
Justin Bigham - CFO
Bill Kreienberg - Chief Banking and Revenue Officer
Mike Grover - Director, Financial Planning and Analysis
Conference Call Participants
Alex Twerdahl - Piper Sandler
Damon DelMonte - KBW
Joe Fenech - Hovde Group
Operator
Good day, and welcome to the Financial Institutions, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Shelly Doran, Director of Investor and External Relations, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Please go ahead.
Shelly Doran
Thank you for joining us for today's call.
Providing prepared comments will be President and Chief Executive Officer, Marty Birmingham and Chief Financial Officer, Justin Bigham. They will be joined by Chief Banking and Revenue Officer, Bill Kreienberg, and Director of Financial Planning and Analysis, Mike Grover for the question-and-answer portion of the call.
Today's prepared comments and Q&A will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. We refer you to yesterday's earnings release and historical SEC filings which are available on our website for a Safe Harbor description and a detailed discussion of the risk factors relating to forward-looking statements. We will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures intended to supplement and not substitute for comparable GAAP measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures were provided in the earnings release, which was filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K. Please note that this call includes information that is accurate only as of today's date, January 31, 2020.
I'll now turn the call over to Marty.
Marty Birmingham
Thank you, Shelly. Good morning and welcome to the fourth quarter and year-end earnings call.
We are pleased to report another strong quarter with net income of $13.1 million or $0.79 per diluted share. Pre-tax pre-provision income for the quarter was $16.1 million. 2019 was a year of great accomplishment for our Company, with the highest net income and pre-tax pre-provision income in Company history. Results were driven by many factors, including growth in commercial and residential loans, the positive impact of our balance sheet repositioning, including the rotation of securities into loans and rightsizing our consumer indirect portfolio, gains from our timely investment securities sale, our interest rate swap program, expense control, and benefits from tax credit investments, which were a natural extension of our commercial real estate and community development programs. We remain focused on driving long-term shareholder value and are continually seeking opportunities to improve profitability, evident in diverse ways we generated revenue in 2019.
Growth in total loans was 2% in the quarter, with a strong 6.8% increase in commercial mortgage loans and a 2.5% increase in residential loans partially offset by decreases in commercial business and consumer indirect. Fourth quarter C&I volume was lower than expected due to two large commercial loans that were expected to close in the quarter, but did not close until after year end.
Consumer indirect loans continue to decrease as we maintain our focus on growing relationship-based loan categories, commercial and residential, and scaling back consumer indirect lending, especially outside of our footprint. This portfolio decreased by $13.6 million or 1.6% from September 30th and at quarter-end, it comprised 26.4% of our total portfolio, down from 29.8% one year ago. Yield on the consumer indirect portfolio for the quarter was 18 basis points higher than the third quarter of 2019.
Total deposits at quarter-end were $31 million lower than the end of the third quarter and $189 million higher than the year-earlier period. The decrease from September 30, 2019 was primarily due to public deposit seasonality partially offset by growth in the brokered deposit portfolio. Deposit growth from December 31, 2018 was driven by growth in our public, non-public excluding CDs, brokered and reciprocal deposit portfolios. We continue to lower our CD rates, leading to approximately $15 million in roll off of high cost non-public CDs in the quarter.
We had another strong quarter of commercial lending interest rate swap transactions, resulting in fee income of $1.3 million. This fee-based income category will fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter as is primarily based on the number and value of interest rate swap transactions. This program was initiated in the fall of 2017 and performance reflects a continued growth and maturity of our commercial business.
I'd now like to take a few minutes to talk about the 2020 launch of two major initiatives. First is what we are calling the enterprise standardization program. Over the past several months, we've been working with proven advisors, who specialize in near-term self-funding business process improvement, to identify opportunities to improve efficiency, while enhancing customer and employee experiences. We are evaluating activities and functions across the organization, focused on ways to improve operational efficiency and automate low-value repetitive activities using robotic process automation. At this time, I can tell you that we have invested approximately $1 million in professional service expense in 2019 in connection with this initiative and expect to generate annualized expense savings, once implemented within a range of $5 million to $7 million. We expect that some of these cost savings will be reinvested in newly created positions, as we continue to grow and become more sophisticated, coupled with the intended buildout of our branch network in the growth markets of Buffalo and Rochester in the coming years.
Next, is the launch of Five Star Bank Digital Banking. This platform will completely replace our existing digital platform for consumer and commercial customers and will significantly improve the user experience across all devices. We're working diligently on the project related to this initiative and will have more information to provide in the second quarter. New features offered will include online account opening capabilities, additional money transfer options and enhanced cash management services for businesses of all sizes. The cash management line of business is important to us and our commercial customers and our capabilities, reflecting legacy community bank platform have limited our ability to gather and service commercial deposits. We have developed tremendous sophistication in commercial lending and believe this new digital platform will allow us to meet that sophistication on the cash management side, putting us on a par with much larger banks. Most banks of our size are dependent on core banking processors.
Five Star Bank Digital Banking is outside of core and represents our first meaningful fintech partnership. Partnering with a proven fintech provides a differentiated customer experience, positioning us to be even more competitive. The digital platform will be more expensive than our existing system, but is expected to have a payback of less than one year. Enterprise standardization and the digital banking platform represent critical transformational and technology investments for our organization, improving relationships with our customers and enhancing future profitability. Justin will include commentary on the financial impact of the initiatives when he provides our 2020 outlook.
I'll now turn the call over to Justin for additional details on our results and guidance. Justin?
Justin Bigham
Thanks, Marty. Good morning, everyone.
I’ll provide commentary on a few key areas with comparisons to the third quarter of 2019. Net interest income was $33.2 million, up $690,000 compared to the linked-quarter. This was primarily the result of higher average interest-earning assets, combined with the impact of net interest margin expansion. NIM for the quarter was 3.33%, up 4 basis points from the linked-quarter. The average yield on interest-earning assets was 4.22%, a decrease of 7 basis points. Cost of funds was 89 basis points, a decrease of 11 basis points. NIM was positively impacted by 2 basis points in the quarter as a result of unexpected commercial loan prepayments. The remaining NIM expansion was primarily the result of the October rate cut coupled with higher average public deposit balances that positively impacted our cost of funds as expected.
Provision for loan losses was $2.7 million in the quarter, up $809,000 from the third quarter but in line with historical experience and our expectations. Net charge-offs were $3.8 million, compared to last quarter's $4.6 million. In the fourth quarter, we had a $1.9 million in commercial business charge-offs, primarily due to one $1.5 million loan. In the third quarter, we had $3 million partial charge-off related to a commercial credit that was downgraded in the second quarter. Otherwise, our asset quality has remained strong, as evidenced by our level of nonperforming loans and asset quality ratios. Nonperforming loans were $8.6 million in the quarter, a decrease of $1.1 million. Allowance for loan losses to total loans was 95 basis points at quarter-end, down 5 basis points from last quarter and the allowance for loan losses was 353% of nonperforming loans, compared to 324% at 9/30/2019.
Noninterest income was down $2.7 million in the quarter. The key drivers were, first, insurance was down $558,000, primarily due to seasonality and the loss of commercial accounts. Second, we incurred a net loss on tax credit investments of $528,000. And as a reminder, the benefit associated with these tax credit investments is recorded below the line, as a reduction of income tax expense.
Next, you will recall that in the third quarter we benefited from an investment securities sale and reinvestment, generating $1.6 million in gains, compared to a small loss of $44,000 in the current quarter. These three factors were partially offset by another strong quarter of income from derivative instruments or swap fees totaling $1.3 million, an increase of $371,000. Noninterest expense was $26.8 million, an increase of $882,000 from the third quarter. The largest contributors to this increase were professional services expense was up $278,000 because of consulting and advisory projects, primarily in connection with the enterprise standardization project and digital banking platform, and advertising and promotion expense was up $481,000, due to the timing of expenses related to the Bank's branding campaign.
Income tax expense was $312,000 in the quarter, representing an effective tax rate of only 2.3%. Expense was positively impacted by federal and state benefits related to five tax credit investments placed in service during the quarter, resulting in a $2.7 million reduction in tax expense. Our continued focus on revenue growth and efficiency resulted in positive operating leverage for 2019.
I’d now like to spend a few minutes providing our outlook for 2020 in some key areas. We expect low to mid single digit growth in our total loan portfolio with commercial and residential loan production driving the growth. We expect consumer indirect runoff to continue to exceed production with a mid single digit percentage decrease in the portfolio. We anticipate indirect to comprise between 24% and 25% of total loans by year end. We plan for low to mid single digit growth in non-public deposits with growth assisted by the digital banking initiative. We also plan to supplement core deposit growth with a brokered sweep deposit program that will free up collateral, allow us to be less dependent on FHLB borrowings and improve liquidity in the form of unused borrowing capacity of the FHLB.
In what we are currently assuming will be a spot interest rate environment, we are anticipating a quarterly net interest margin of 3.30% to 3.40%, resulting in slight expansion in full-year NIM from the fourth quarter of 2019 run rate. Our NIM can fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter in a spot interest rate environment, given the seasonality of public deposits and its impact on our funding mix. In quarters where our average public deposit balances are higher due to seasonal inflows, our cost of funds is lower. We also forecast a higher NIM in the latter half of the year as our interest earning asset mix improves with growth in the loan portfolio.
As a caveat, our NIM guidance is highly dependent on both the level of interest rates and the shape of the curve. We also project mid single digit growth in noninterest income, excluding gains on investment securities. We expect the largest drivers of noninterest income to be service charges on deposits and debit card income with this growth supported by the digital banking initiative previously discussed. We are targeting an increase in the mid single digit range in non-interest expense. Non-interest expense is expected to be elevated in the first half of the year by the two major initiatives previously discussed. Benefits associated with these initiatives are anticipated to begin in the back half of the year. Additionally, a full year of FDIC insurance premiums is anticipated as FDIC insurance credits were utilized in the second half of 2019.
We anticipate quarterly noninterest expense within a range of $26 million to $28 million per quarter with expenses being highest in the first quarter, followed by reductions in each subsequent quarter as our business process improvement initiatives are implemented in phases over the course of the year. We also expect to continue to see typical quarterly variability in expenses due to the timing of incentive compensation, healthcare expenses, and marketing costs. We anticipate that our efficiency ratio will be within a range of 60% to 61% for the full year with a fourth quarter efficiency ratio between 57% and 59%. We expect our efficiency ratio to be higher in the first half of the year, given the timing of expenses.
We expect that the effective tax rate will be within a range of 20% to 21%, which includes the impact of the amortization of tax credit investments placed in service in 2019. We will continue to evaluate tax credit investment opportunities and our effective tax rate would be positively impacted by taking advantage of further investment opportunities. We currently expect the provision for credit losses of approximately $2 million to $3 million per quarter, based on current economic conditions. This guidance is based on assumptions for charge-offs and changes in our loan portfolio. It does not assume any changes in provision due to economic conditions. Under CECL, provision expense will be subject to more volatility, depending on changes in the economic forecast, as well as a variety of other factors. In conclusion, our 2020 outlook reflects our continued focus on revenue growth and expense control, resulting in year-over-year positive operating leverage.
Continuing the CECL discussion, let me provide an update on our status and projections for the implementation of CECL. While we are still in the process of validating and finalizing implementation, our team made significant progress in the fourth quarter. Current estimates include the potential impact of unfunded commitments, individually evaluated loans, preliminary qualitative factors and investment securities. As a result of our updated analysis, we estimate that at this point in time, and based on current economic conditions and projections the January 1, 2020 implementation of CECL could result in an increase of 15% to 30% in our reserve for credit losses. Given these ranges, we would anticipate an after-tax cumulative effect adjustment, which would be a reduction to retained earnings of between $4.6 million and $9.1 million. Just to reiterate, we are still finalizing policies, controls, processes disclosures and other assumptions. These estimates are subject to change upon finalization of our procedures and execution of our internal control framework.
With that said, I'll now turn the call back to Marty for closing remarks.
Marty Birmingham
Thank you, Justin.
I'd like to provide an overview of the commercial loan and credit environment in our markets. First, I'll provide a few thoughts on the commercial real estate. We continue see a steady and consistent pipeline because we focus on a fairly narrow type of commercial real estate customer with a track record of execution in a portfolio that consistently generates cash flow. For our commercial team, it's all about consistency. We are seeing increased paydown activity in commercial real estate, primarily due to our unwillingness to compete on rate for permanent long-term loans. For example, we have an unexpected $11 million payoff from a customer in the fourth quarter, the customer refinance with Fannie Mae at rate and term we would not match. Our overall C&I pipelines remains steady and our expansion in the Central New York region continues to payoff, as we now have two lenders there with growing pipelines.
Regarding the credit environment, we're still seeing strong amount of activity, quality remains good and we're picking our spots. Strategic focus for our organization has been and continues to be on the importance of credit discipline and we have not used our credit standards. We are also still experiencing the benefit of customers moving business from large banks.
And lastly, it is important to note that we benefit from operating in a very stable market, not typically subject to cyclicality. Our performance ratios continued to strengthen in the fourth quarter. Return on average assets was 1.21%, 2 basis points higher than the third quarter of 2019; for the full year, it was 1.14% compared to 0.95% in 2018. Return on average equity was 11.88%, also 2 basis points higher than the third quarter; for the full year, it was 11.61% compared to 10.18% in 2018. And our TCE ratio increased to 8.05%, up 6 basis points from September 30th, 2019; and up 90 basis points from year-end 2018.
As I said in my opening comments, 2019 was a year of accomplishment for our Company. We generated strong financial results, invested in our customers, our communities and our associates. We positioned our balance sheet to improve profitability and continued to diversify noninterest income. We also made strategic technology and transformation investments that position us well for future success. We are looking forward with anticipation to the launch of both the Five Star Bank Digital Banking platform and the positive impact of enterprise standardization initiatives. We believe these investments will help us continue to move our Company forward to deliver more value for those we serve and for our shareholders.
Operator, this concludes our prepared comments. We're ready for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Alex Twerdahl of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.
Alex Twerdahl
Just first off, I wanted to ask a couple more questions about the enterprise standardization program. I think, I heard in your prepared remarks that you expect to see around $5 million to $7 million of savings. I'm not sure if that's this year or annually and sort of the timing and when that’s going to come into place. And then, it also sounds like at least some of that’s going to be reinvested. And I’m just trying to figure out how much of that over time will actually drop to the bottom line.
Justin Bigham
So, Alex, what I can tell you is that the guidance that I provided incorporates our perspective on those benefits. I can also tell you that it's our expectation that about half of that range we're going to see in 2019 -- I'm sorry, 2020, with the remaining half in the following year. And as I said, our guidance has incorporated any reinvestment that's required as a result of that initiative.
Alex Twerdahl
Okay, thanks. And then, is it also expected to provide additional revenues as well or is it primarily an expense initiative?
Bill Kreienberg
Well, I think Alex -- this is Bill Kreienberg. As an example, we expect to create a greater customer experience through this efficiency process. For example, we believe in our mortgage group. We can cut down the time from application to commitment, improve communication with our customers, which net example should drive more sales, drive a better customer experience. So, we will see outcomes like that throughout the standardization project.
Justin Bigham
Alex -- and I'll just reiterate, from a guidance perspective, to help you with your question a little bit further, we've only put an assumption in for what we feel confident we will get. And so, from the perspective of the 5 to 7, you should think about that as being primarily expense-oriented.
Alex Twerdahl
Great. And then, based on what you are saying in terms of the remaining half of this cost saves being realized in 2021, should we expect further efficiency ratio improvement in ‘21 as well, down from that 57 to 59 range by the fourth quarter?
Justin Bigham
We haven't looked at that yet, Alex. As far as how you should think about it, I mean, every organization is going to experience some expense growth every year. So, certainly, there's going to be some benefit that we’ll see in 2021, but we haven't modeled the impact of that yet.
Alex Twerdahl
Okay. And then, Marty, in your loan guidance commentary, for 2020, does that or at least contemplate sort of similar levels of pay down to what you’ve been seeing recently?
Marty Birmingham
I think it does. We have, in our planning for 2020, incorporated a lot of discussion from our vendors up. And it does incorporate the current market conditions and the activity that's going out there.
Alex Twerdahl
Okay. And then, just final question for me. Just as we kind of think about CECL conceptually, over the next couple years and kind of coupling with the fact that you have this consumer indirect portfolio that's becoming a smaller percentage of the overall pie. Does that suggest that maybe all else being equal, just that mix shift alone should cause reserves to come down under the CECL model over time?
Justin Bigham
So, I mean, I think intuitively, Alex, the way you're thinking about it is the right way to think about it. But just remember that if total loans are growing, then our CECL provision will grow. So, it is a loan-by-loan analysis. Having said that, I think you're right that indirect represents a higher reserve rate in CECL than our commercial book. So, from a weighted-average perspective, it could start to come down on a weighted-average basis, but the overall reserve will likely continue to increase as long as we continue to grow our loan portfolio.
Operator
The next question comes from Damon DelMonte of KBW. Please go ahead.
Damon DelMonte
Hey. Good morning, guys. How is it going today?
Justin Bigham
Great. Good morning, Damon.
Marty Birmingham
Good morning, Damon.
Damon DelMonte
Great. So, just a quick question on the margin, Justin, I think you gave a good range of 330 to 340. Could you just remind us a little bit about the seasonality of the public deposit and when we may see a little bit of a boost to the margin when you bring those lower cost deposits in?
Justin Bigham
Sure. I can help you with that. So, our public deposit book, as I look at the seasonality of that book, it tends to be -- we just obviously -- you've got the back half of the year. We are going to start to see it increase in February. It will peak out in March, late Match, it peaks, and then starts to come back down again. So, that's more on a sort of spot balance perspective. So, obviously, the averages trail those spot results. But, that is the seasonality. And I think if you look at the commentary we've provided in each quarterly call this year, you can expect exactly the same types of seasonality as we've seen this year for future years.
Damon DelMonte
Okay, great. That's helpful. And then, with regard to the digital banking component of the two initiatives, is the expected benefit from that implementation included in the noninterest income guidance this year?
Justin Bigham
Yes, it is.
Damon DelMonte
Okay. So, when do you expect to have that up and fully running?
Justin Bigham
So, we're describing it right now at the back half of the year. We don't have a specific date that we can disclose at this point. But, we are -- that is what we're targeting right now is the back half of the year. And we have put in, as we said, some benefits associated with it in that timeframe.
Damon DelMonte
Got it. Okay. And then, just lastly is just from a modeling standpoint, so these higher expenses that you're going to see in the first half of the year, related to these initiatives, that's primarily going to be in the professional services line, or is it going to be spread into multiple categories? Like, [Multiple Speakers] by bringing more people on, things like that?
Justin Bigham
So, we're going to see our typical -- I'll think about it this way. Our typical seasonality that we have is going to continue to exist. So, in the first quarter, there's going to be increases to our salary and benefits line associated with merit, associated with extra tax expense as a part of the payoffs of folks, bonuses, et cetera. FDIC is coming back as well. And then, in addition, we will stay at elevated levels associated with what we're paying for these consultants.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Joe Fenech of Hovde Group. Please go ahead.
Joe Fenech
My question on efficiency was answered, but just a couple others here. I guess, Marty or Justin, with the TCE ratio being over 8%, that's a significant milestone for you all. Can you talk about what you think an optimized TCE ratio would be for you? And once you get there, would you reorder at all the capital management priorities that you have? All the things being equal, like the price of the stock, assuming that, and then also given the slower pace of loan growth that you're projecting, which I'm assuming will translate to a faster pace of capital build. Any updated thoughts I guess on capital management?
Marty Birmingham
We've always been comfortable with the capitalization of the company, Joe. And we try to be responsive and responsible in terms of the TCE ratio and driving the increased number that we currently sit with today. I think, the highest and best use of our capital is to reinvest it in the business, to support our growth initiatives. As you -- we'll monitor it closely with our board relative to the priorities of how we allocate capital in light of, as you're pointing out, our growth projections. But, the highest and best use clearly from my perspective is to continue to invest in the Company, supporting our growth.
Joe Fenech
Okay. And then, you’ve all have done a nice job transforming the balance sheet the last few years, and I appreciate the continuation of that with some of the targets that Justin outlined, I guess this morning in terms of the loan portfolio mix that you're targeting. If you look out longer term, I guess similar question on capital, is there optimal mix, a balance sheet mix or revenue mix or however you want to look at? And what does your profitability look like at that optimal balance sheet mix? So, I guess, it's just a simple way of asking longer term targets for mix and profitability.
Justin Bigham
So, we haven't really provided longer term targets for mix and profitability. But, I mean, we're going to continue certainly for 2020, as described in the guidance with the focus. And I anticipate this focus will continue beyond 2020 on relationship business. So, the indirect auto business is not a relationship business. We're going to continue to right-size that with a focus on those relationships. So, the only other piece of information I can give you and feel comfortable giving you is, from a securities perspective, we're going to target 18% to 19% of total assets for securities. So, we're not necessarily looking to make any changes there. So, from a mix perspective, that will obviously, if our assets continue to grow, we will need to continue to grow slightly our securities portfolio. But, from a mix perspective, I think it's more of the same answer to your question, Joe.
Marty Birmingham
So, we feel really good about our business model. We've made some investments strategically. We've got a really strong and high-performing community bank where we can deliver education advice and solutions to all of our consumer and commercial clients and supplement that with the wealth management and risk management that our insurance brokerage provides. So, that translates, as Justin is talking about, into the relationship-based activities at the bank level of loans and deposits with core customers as well growing our noninterest revenues and reducing reliance on the NIM business as we continue to push forward.
Joe Fenech
Okay. I appreciate all that. I guess, just the follow-up, with CECL and the appreciated I guess projected impact on provisioning and whatever else. Does that change at all any thoughts on how you want to manage the business longer term? So, for instance, if CECL didn’t exist, it kind of felt like after last quarter that the balance sheet transition was -- that phase was done. But, maybe you’re just kind of waiting for the fourth quarter to kind of officially provide projections for this upcoming year. Was CECL coincidental to this next phase of the balance sheet transition or the does it impact your thinking on that?
Justin Bigham
I don't -- I think, I'm going to address it the way you started with the question was, is CECL going to change the way we run the business, and I think the short answer to that at this time is no. But, I think, the entire industry is going to be really interested to see how CECL impacts banks on a quarter-to-quarter basis, particularly as economic forecast change. And then, I think the banking industry as a whole is going to have to react to that however they see fit.
Joe Fenech
Okay. And then, last one for me. I guess, there has been some pickup in M&A activity in your markets. Just remind us, especially with a little bit more capital management flexibility of the M&A strategy and kind of how you think about M&A for the company?
Marty Birmingham
So, we're obviously open to those possibilities and we are well aware of the transactions that have occurred, Joe. I think, from our perspective, we want to be very disciplined in terms of the pursuit of those transactions, those opportunities and making sure that they are incrementally positive in the ways that you would expect them to be relative to accretion, dilution and earn back. And, from our perspective, we feel good about the execution of our strategic plan, pursuing organic growth and especially relative to the transaction just occurred.
Operator
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Marty Birmingham, President and Chief Executive, for any closing remarks.
Marty Birmingham
Thanks, operator. I just want to thank everybody for their participation this morning. We’ll look forward to continuing to build our dialogue with you in future quarters.
Operator
The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.