https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/politics/2019/11/12/blower_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqjYeQRtCUmaNTl9ge3SkvXvsQtCHq939w7zx1f6lxc4.jpg?imwidth=450
There is a chance that the 2019 UK general election could end with a hung parliament.

What is a hung parliament? What happens when no party wins an election majority?

by

The UK is heading to the polls on Dec 12, 2019 but, there is a chance that the results could end up with a hung parliament. So, what happens if no party wins the General Election 2019? Who will be the prime minister? When will we get the next government?

What is a hung parliament?

A hung parliament means no party has won enough seats in a general election to have a majority in the House of Commons. 

If no one gets a majority at the election, who will be PM?

Boris Johnson. In a hung parliament, the incumbent PM stays in office - and lives in Downing Street - until it is decided who will attempt to form a new government.

How is that decided?

According to the Cabinet Manual, the closet thing Britain has to a rule-book here, the incumbent PM is entitled to attempt to form a government then stay in office until Parliament meets, when they can ask MPs to approve his Queen’s Speech.

So Mr Johnson would be PM until Parliament meets again?

Not quite. The Cabinet Manual also says that an incumbent government “is expected to resign if it becomes clear that it is unlikely to be able to command that confidence and there is a clear alternative.”

That could allow Labour to argue that Mr Johnson should quit before a certain date if there is clearly an “anti-Tory” majority in the Commons that would inevitably reject his Queen’s Speech and support Jeremy Corbyn as PM.

What would happen if Mr Johnson resigned?

Mr Corbyn would then be first in line to have the chance to form a government which would put its Queen’s Speech to the Commons to see if he could win the support of a majority of MPs.

Does a hung parliament mean a coalition government?

Not necessarily. A majority coalition is a formal agreement between two or more parties who between them have more than 323 MPs.

All the parties then get to provide ministers in the government. 

But there are other options. A new PM could decide not to seek a coalition with any other party and instead rely on a 'confidence-and-supply' deal with smaller allies.

That means the smaller parties would support the government on financial matters like the Budget, and in confidence votes which would otherwise bring the government down. The smaller parties wouldn't get ministerial jobs, but they would expect concessions on their chosen policies.

There's also the option of a minority coalition, where the governing party makes a formal agreement with a smaller party but together they still don't have a majority, meaning they have to seek support in the Commons for every vote.

Finally, a party that lacks a majority could simply try to go it alone and govern as a minority government, vulnerable to being voted down at any time and trying to win the support of other parties on an ad hoc basis for every vote. Minority governments rarely last long.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/politics/2019/11/12/TELEMMGLPICT000215938988_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqLeUJvOJqnV613e1NxllMSYIixnj0N-lTmS4HQcSqwKA.jpeg?imwidth=480

How long would it take to sort it all out?

In 2010, the Conservatives and Lib Dems agreed their coalition in five days, largely because they were worried that financial markets would panic if Britain did not form a new government quickly.

But everyone involved now agrees that it was done too quickly, meaning some important decisions were botched. Any such talks this year could take much longer.

Could Mr Corbyn be PM even if Labour isn't the biggest party?

Technically, yes. A PM simply has to command the confidence of the Commons: the size of his own party is constitutionally (if not politically) irrelevant.

The first Labour prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, took office in 1924 even though Labour had fewer seats than the Conservatives and relying on the tacit support of the Liberals.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2017/05/31/TELEMMGLPICT000003873647_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqwj4wOfSbCvCju4t9NhXhnikiJ1yc4EZrb5UXEFho6dI.jpeg?imwidth=480
First Labour prime minister Ramsay MacDonald, pictured leaving 10 Downing Street, took office in 1924 even though he had fewer seats than the Conservatives. Credit: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images

Would that be sustainable?

Quite possibly not. Prime Minister Corbyn would be vulnerable to being brought down by a combination of Conservative and SNP votes. MacDonald’s government lasted only 10 months before collapsing. Baldwin’s Conservatives won the October 1924 election handsomely.